> If I were really the "dictator" as which you were "kind" enough to entitle > me, I sure wouldn't have spent all the recent work in cleanly integratiting > subtitle support into VDR. The original patch/plugin was way too complex > for my taste. Please, nothing personal :))) I really admired by the product and work you have done. But it is very difficult to see it's future with such development model. > I don't want to work on a VDR where people can check in monster changes > into a CVS or whatever, and the next time I sit down to do something, > I first have to (meaning: am *forced* to) deal with what others have > modified, so that I understand the source again. I rather take one > topic at a time, look at whatever patches etc. are available, and > consider how things really fit into the big picture. That can mean that > the patch will be integrated just "as is", because it is the right > solution, or it can mean that I come up with a solution of my own, > that (I believe) fits better into the VDR structure. You see, that what I'm talking about. If VDR is one-man-project or it is targeted to community. It's your choice, you have all rights to decide what approach is the best for your child. >> Imagine if Linus Torvalds were the only man, who were decision maker >> in kernel's development. I belive linux never become so popular >> because of being always 2 steps backward of current community's needs. > Don't compare me to Linus - I don't deserve that honor ;-) Why not? :) And see how Linus become superstar, not just doing a good product, but more by enlarging the audience interested in it's future ;) _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
