On 19 Apr 2007, at 09:55, Torgeir Veimo wrote: >> >> In the original post I was just wondering if xineliboutput has been >> written with the matrox specific instructions that softdevice's "-vo >> dfb:mgatv" uses. As I don't understand the difference between "-vo >> dfb:" & "-vo dfb:mgatv" I can't really say what difference this would >> make. > > I belive this is entirely dependent on what xine instance you're > using with xinelib. Are you using df_xine? I think it should handle > field parity correctly. Hmm, I guess I'm confusing xinelibout with the xine device output plugin... -- Torgeir Veimo torgeir@xxxxxxxxx
