On 19 Apr 2007, at 09:41, Alasdair Campbell wrote: > > In the original post I was just wondering if xineliboutput has been > written with the matrox specific instructions that softdevice's "-vo > dfb:mgatv" uses. As I don't understand the difference between "-vo > dfb:" & "-vo dfb:mgatv" I can't really say what difference this would > make. I belive this is entirely dependent on what xine instance you're using with xinelib. Are you using df_xine? I think it should handle field parity correctly. -- Torgeir Veimo torgeir@xxxxxxxxx
