The patch that enable multiple frontend with shared bus, should be finished and on my pc it seems to be stable enough. http://tux.dpeddi.com/lr319sta/downloads/vdr_1.4.5_eddi-multiple-frontend_v5 .patch Now the patch don't switch frontend, is recording in progress. Best Regards, Eddi > -----Messaggio originale----- > Da: vdr-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:vdr-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Per conto di > Eddi > Inviato: sabato 10 febbraio 2007 11.17 > A: 'VDR Mailing List' > Oggetto: R: [PATCH]: VDR & Multiple frontends, another try > > Hi, I've made another patch to vdr 1.4.5. > > Now I have used your suggestion, and the patch seems to be stable. > > http://tux.dpeddi.com/lr319sta/downloads/vdr_1.4.5_eddi-multiple- > frontend_v2 > .patch > > At the moment I've tested it only with live view. > > Klaus, please look at this patch again and tell me what do you think. > > However I'm sure that what I'm done can be optimized. > > Best regards > > Eddi > > > > > -----Messaggio originale----- > > Da: vdr-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:vdr-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Per conto > di > > Eddi > > Inviato: venerd? 9 febbraio 2007 14.28 > > A: 'VDR Mailing List' > > Oggetto: R: [PATCH]: VDR & Multiple frontends > > > > Ok, I hope that what I have done, may describe the algorithm that I > think > > may be necessary to get multiple frontend working. > > I know that the solution I choose are not the best and right, I'm not a > > c++ > > programmer! > > > > The only solution I found to close all file descriptors and > > /dev/dvb/adapter0/frontend0 was to add the close fd_frontend to the dvb > > device destructor. > > > > Eddi > > > > > -----Messaggio originale----- > > > Da: vdr-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:vdr-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Per conto > > di > > > Klaus Schmidinger > > > Inviato: venerd? 9 febbraio 2007 13.43 > > > A: vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx > > > Oggetto: Re: [PATCH]: VDR & Multiple frontends > > > > > > Eddi wrote: > > > > So what do you think should be the right way? > > > > > > I haven't decided yet how to do that. > > > > > > I just wanted to let you know that deleting the cDvbDevice > > > is not the way to go - especially if you delete it from within > > > one of its own member functions ;-) It's no wonder your patched > > > version fails it you saw off the branch you're sitting on. > > > > > > Klaus > > > > > > >> -----Messaggio originale----- > > > >> Da: vdr-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:vdr-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Per > > conto > > > di > > > >> Klaus Schmidinger > > > >> Inviato: venerd? 9 febbraio 2007 8.27 > > > >> A: vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx > > > >> Oggetto: Re: R: [PATCH] R: R: VDR & Multiple frontends > > > >> > > > >> Eddi wrote: > > > >>> I need help.... > > > >>> > > > >>> This is why sometimes hangs after my patch... > > > >>> > > > >>> On ProvidesChannel I delete the cDvbDevice and i make it again. > > > >> Deleting the cDvbDevice is definitely the wrong way to do this. > > > >> > > > >> Klaus > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > vdr mailing list > > > vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx > > > http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > vdr mailing list > > vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx > > http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: vdr_1.4.5_eddi-multiple-frontend_v5.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 17338 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/vdr/attachments/20070224/3159743c/vdr_1.4.5_eddi-multiple-frontend_v5.obj
