R: [PATCH]: VDR & Multiple frontends

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ok, I hope that what I have done, may describe the algorithm that I think
may be necessary to get multiple frontend working.
I know that the solution I choose are not the best and right, I'm not a c++
programmer!

The only solution I found to close all file descriptors and
/dev/dvb/adapter0/frontend0 was to add the close fd_frontend to the dvb
device destructor.

Eddi

> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: vdr-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:vdr-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Per conto di
> Klaus Schmidinger
> Inviato: venerd? 9 febbraio 2007 13.43
> A: vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Oggetto: Re: [PATCH]: VDR & Multiple frontends
> 
> Eddi wrote:
> > So what do you think should be the right way?
> 
> I haven't decided yet how to do that.
> 
> I just wanted to let you know that deleting the cDvbDevice
> is not the way to go - especially if you delete it from within
> one of its own member functions ;-) It's no wonder your patched
> version fails it you saw off the branch you're sitting on.
> 
> Klaus
> 
> >> -----Messaggio originale-----
> >> Da: vdr-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:vdr-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Per conto
> di
> >> Klaus Schmidinger
> >> Inviato: venerd? 9 febbraio 2007 8.27
> >> A: vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Oggetto: Re: R: [PATCH] R: R: VDR & Multiple frontends
> >>
> >> Eddi wrote:
> >>> I need help....
> >>>
> >>> This is why sometimes hangs after my patch...
> >>>
> >>> On ProvidesChannel I delete the cDvbDevice and i make it again.
> >> Deleting the cDvbDevice is definitely the wrong way to do this.
> >>
> >> Klaus
> 
> _______________________________________________
> vdr mailing list
> vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux