Re: vdr diseqc equivalence of szap diseqc n ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: vdr diseqc equivalence of szap diseqc n ?
From: Gregoire.Favre at gmail.com (Gregoire Favre)
Date: Sat Feb 10 17:47:44 2007
In-reply-to: <20070202231709.GB5208@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <20070130232829.GC5436@xxxxxxxxx> <20070201215811.GC5319@xxxxxxxxx> <45C3A424.4070601@xxxxxx> <20070202231709.GB5208@xxxxxxxxx>

Hello,

of course there is NO problem with vdr diseqc commands, see my posting
with title "THANK YOU Reinhard Nissl (diseqc)" for more info.

Thank and have a good day,
-- 
Gr?goire FAVRE  http://gregoire.favre.googlepages.com  http://www.gnupg.org

References:
- vdr diseqc equivalence of szap diseqc n ?
  - From: Gregoire Favre
- Re: vdr diseqc equivalence of szap diseqc n ?
  - From: Gregoire Favre
- Re: vdr diseqc equivalence of szap diseqc n ?
  - From: Reinhard Nissl
- Re: vdr diseqc equivalence of szap diseqc n ?
  - From: Gregoire Favre

Prev by Date: THANK YOU Reinhard Nissl (diseqc)
Next by Date: Safer diseqc setup ?
Previous by thread: Re: vdr diseqc equivalence of szap diseqc n ?
Next by thread: FF card AV sync problems, possible fix to VDR
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Media] [Asterisk] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Xorg] [Util Linux NG] [Xfree86] [Big List of Linux Books] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Women] [ALSA Devel] [Linux USB]

Powered by Linux