On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 02:13:25PM +0100, Chris Jones wrote: > No probs - at this stage I'm grateful for as much input (no pun intended ;) > on the issue as I can get, because I'm a bit stumped! I'd really like to > avoid patches if possible, if only because between the various xine and vdr > patches and packages, keeping current is proving rather time intensive! Testing CVS releases of softdevice and DirectFB can be even more time intensive, but it can also be very rewarding. > Hmm, that's very interesting. I guess I should start reading the source. It's not that hard to make simple modifications to kernel modules. BTW, I found out that the vdr-remote plugin reduces the key-repeat rate by using some timer magic. On IR remotes using the RC5 code, the inherent repeat rate is 113.8 ms. Using vdr-remote plugin, the rate was something like half or third of that. With softdevice and DirectFB linux-input driver and with my kernel patch, I get all RC5 frames (except the first repeated one that I discard on purpose) mapped to vdr key events. Marko
