lirc improvement suggestion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Darren Salt schrieb:
> I demand that Joerg Riechardt may or may not have written...
> 
>> Darren Salt schrieb:
>>> I demand that Ville Skytt? may or may not have written...
> [snip]
>>>> -#define REPEATLIMIT  20 // ms
>>>>  #define REPEATDELAY 350 // ms
>>>> -#define KEYPRESSDELAY 150 // ms
>>>> +#define REPEATFREQ 100 // ms
>>> No. You want at least 114 (for RC5).
>>> [snip]
> 
>> Do you mean REPEATFREQ? It works well here with RC5 and 100.
> 
> (Actually, it's also misnamed: that's a repeat interval.)
> 
> The RC5 repeat interval is (IIRC) 113.4ms. Any soft repeat handler needs to
> have an interval which is no less than this else sometimes you'll be unable
> to avoid an extra repeat.

If you look at how the code works, you will find that that?s not true.
And the repeat interval (incoming keys) depends on the lirc driver. With 
different drivers there are different intervals for the same remote. And 
I am not writing from theory, i checked it.
J?rg

> 
>> Doesn't it work for you??
> 
> Not checked; I'm using LIRC via gxine and irexec.
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux