lirc improvement suggestion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I demand that Joerg Riechardt may or may not have written...

> Darren Salt schrieb:
>> I demand that Ville Skytt? may or may not have written...
[snip]
>>> -#define REPEATLIMIT  20 // ms
>>>  #define REPEATDELAY 350 // ms
>>> -#define KEYPRESSDELAY 150 // ms
>>> +#define REPEATFREQ 100 // ms
>> No. You want at least 114 (for RC5).
>> [snip]

> Do you mean REPEATFREQ? It works well here with RC5 and 100.

(Actually, it's also misnamed: that's a repeat interval.)

The RC5 repeat interval is (IIRC) 113.4ms. Any soft repeat handler needs to
have an interval which is no less than this else sometimes you'll be unable
to avoid an extra repeat.

> Doesn't it work for you??

Not checked; I'm using LIRC via gxine and irexec.

-- 
| Darren Salt    | linux or ds at              | nr. Ashington, | Toon
| RISC OS, Linux | youmustbejoking,demon,co,uk | Northumberland | Army
| + Lobby friends, family, business, government.    WE'RE KILLING THE PLANET.

You will be travelling and coming into a fortune.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux