> Ville Skytt?? schrieb: > >>On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 16:12 +0200, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: >> >> >> >>>That would be total overkill. I guess I shouldn't have >>>introduced APIVERSION in the first place, since, as you stated, >>>it just takes a 'make plugins'. Oh well, so I'll bump up the API >>>version, drop all the '#if APIVERSNUM...' stuff and include >>>Stefan's 'libsi' fixes >>> >>> >> >>My .02???: please keep APIVERSION, but please also don't be afraid to >> bump >>it whenever needed. No need to introduce #if madness. APIVERSION is a >>convenience and shouldn't prevent real fixes or enhancements from >>entering the codebase. >> >> > Yep agree with this. :) +1 ;) > > > _______________________________________________ > vdr mailing list > vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr > > As soon as APIVERSION avoids fixes or useful improvments (i.e. director plugin :-)) it should be dropped. As already mentioned before there are so many patches which chamge the api, that the APIVERSION is not a very reliable way to avoid the need of recompiling plugins. Anyway is it a big mess to recompile the plugins? This additinal step while compiling a new vdr version should not take too long.
