Am Dienstag, 23. Mai 2006 18:30 schrieb Andreas Brugger:
> of the devices (first or last):
> > - cDevice *d = NULL;
> > + cDevice *d = device[0]; // or device[numDevices]
>
> So the two timers should evaluate to different priorities.
>
> Any thoughts on that? Do I miss something again?
I think so ;-) because if d is set to first device then
else if (d && device[i]->Priority() < d->Priority())
pri = 6; // receiving but priority is lower
the first loop does not match the if condition. It would work if d was
initially set to the last device. But I don't know if this would make
problems in any other cases.
Christian
