Ed from PVRWeb wrote: >> After some Googling I've found another web site mirroring this list >> (http://pvrweb.com). I think the mirror is auto created, but the > generated >> threads contains all the sender mail addresses for followup messages in >> clear text. > > Just to make this clear... All the incoming messages have the email > addresses changed so they will read 'name at address.com' so this will > not get picked up by most spam systems. I think this is the same > procedure used by the published copy on the main site. > > Where this idea failed was that in the message in question someone had > included the email address in the message. I am looking into scanning > the messages for email addresses without messing up code fragments now. > I believe that it is no big thing to include "support" for "email at host" in email-collector robots. If "email at host" is the general format to "protect" against robots it will no longer be a protection. The question is if the sender adress has to be to be published in any form? I think an archive is more suitable for just following previous threads than contacting someone months or years later. Regards Peter http://vaasa.wi-bw.tfh-wildau.de/~pjuszack/digicam - My VDR and plugins
