Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: > Udo Richter wrote: > >> Klaus Schmidinger wrote: >> >>> After more consideration I don't like this any more. >>> This flag would typically be set on a normal (i.e. plain >>> vanilla) VDR (where users manage their timers through the >>> "Edit timer" menu), making the flag numbers unnecessary >>> large. >> >> >> >> You could just reverse the bit meaning, and clear that bit on edit. >> Only external programs that want to check for modifications would set >> that bit then. > > > I'm having a deja vu. > > tfUnmodified = 0xffff0000 > > :-) Well, as you yourself have already pointed out, an external application needs to keep track of its own timers, so there wont't be any such flag handling any more. Klaus
