[RFC] Eliminating the 'summary' field of timers (update)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Udo Richter wrote:
> Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> 
>> After more consideration I don't like this any more.
>> This flag would typically be set on a normal (i.e. plain
>> vanilla) VDR (where users manage their timers through the
>> "Edit timer" menu), making the flag numbers unnecessary
>> large. 
> 
> 
> You could just reverse the bit meaning, and clear that bit on edit. Only 
> external programs that want to check for modifications would set that 
> bit then.

I'm having a deja vu.

tfUnmodified = 0xffff0000

:-)


Bis denn

-- 
Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as
bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer
wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated,
cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux