El Martes, 21 de Febrero de 2006 21:40, Jose Alberto Reguero escribi?:
> El Martes, 21 de Febrero de 2006 21:14, Jukka Vaisanen escribi?:
> > Jose wrote:
> > >> In both cases I think if that card was already being used for a
> >
> > recording,
> >
> > >> that recording would get bumped off regardless of any priorities etc.
> > >> Smells ugly..?
> > >
> > >If a card is used for a recording, cDevice::GetDevice don't take it.
> >
> > But in the loop to find the device:
> > >> for (int i = 0; i < cDevice::NumDevices();
> >
> > ++i) {
> >
> > >> cDevice *dev = cDevice::GetDevice(i);
> > >> if (dev->ProvidesChannel(current, 0)
> >
> > && dev != device) { newdev = dev;
> >
> > >> break;
> > >> }
> >
> > I don't see how GetDevice could not "take" a device being used for
> > recording since we're accessing it with an index number
> > 0..(NumDevices-1) and not asking by channel + priority. And if GetDevice
> > were to return NULL here for a device being used for recording, this
> > would segfault on the dev->ProvidesChannel(...) call.
> >
> > So I think it *will* grab the first device (by index) that a) can serve
> > this channel b) is not used for live tv.
>
> I refer to cDevice::GetDevice(Channel, Priority)
> And even if it is not recording and there is not another device free, then
> cServerConnection::GetDevice returns NULL.
> Jose alberto
Also dev->ProvidesChannel don't take the thevice if it is recording.
You can try it.
Jose Alberto
>
> > - Jukka Vaisanen
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > vdr mailing list
> > vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
>
> _______________________________________________
> vdr mailing list
> vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
