El Martes, 21 de Febrero de 2006 21:14, Jukka Vaisanen escribi?:
> Jose wrote:
> >> In both cases I think if that card was already being used for a
>
> recording,
>
> >> that recording would get bumped off regardless of any priorities etc.
> >> Smells ugly..?
> >
> >If a card is used for a recording, cDevice::GetDevice don't take it.
>
> But in the loop to find the device:
> >> for (int i = 0; i < cDevice::NumDevices();
>
> ++i) {
>
> >> cDevice *dev = cDevice::GetDevice(i);
> >> if (dev->ProvidesChannel(current, 0)
>
> && dev != device) { newdev = dev;
>
> >> break;
> >> }
>
> I don't see how GetDevice could not "take" a device being used for
> recording since we're accessing it with an index number
> 0..(NumDevices-1) and not asking by channel + priority. And if GetDevice
> were to return NULL here for a device being used for recording, this
> would segfault on the dev->ProvidesChannel(...) call.
>
> So I think it *will* grab the first device (by index) that a) can serve
> this channel b) is not used for live tv.
I refer to cDevice::GetDevice(Channel, Priority)
And even if it is not recording and there is not another device free, then
cServerConnection::GetDevice returns NULL.
Jose alberto
>
> - Jukka Vaisanen
>
> _______________________________________________
> vdr mailing list
> vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
