Gregoire Favre wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 11:01:21PM +0100, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: > > >>Is there something that i missed? I can't see how a blacklist can help >>with bad data. > > As the process_summary.pl don't have any effect here. 1.3.<current> VDR? Send a few info.vdrs then i can test them. The code wasn't tested on real files. :-) > I have written > some scripts to deal with my reccording, some have good title and good > subtitle which are perfect for done, but some have title, no subtitle > but a description which is good enough to write it in deepblack. I've something similar implemented in Master-Timer, but only for a few specific channels. If there is NO subtitle but a description then MD5 the description and put it into the subtitle. This is equivalent to your method of putting the description into deepblack. (Except that e.g. case-changes will generate another MD5 but deepblack is case-insensitive) But if i change the MD5-generation a bit and activate it for all channels it may be the solution for you. -> Kill subtitle if the subtitle equals the title (e.g. Pro 7) -> Convert the description to lowercase -> Strip whitespaces and punctuation from the description then MD5 it and put it into the subtitle. This is a bit more robust against 'subtle' changes in the text which would make it 'binary different' otherwise. OTOH MD5-Sums as subtitles aren't exactly good for the WAF. :-) Hmm. I guess a 'generate MD5 sums for bad subtitles'-config-option is appropriate. :-) > I don't know if it's me who have missed something, for example how to > deal with process_summary.pl ? In that case, I would really enjoy to > know about it :) It may be that my info.vdr-code doesn't function properly. :-) Bis denn -- Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated, cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous.
