Ville Skytt? schrieb: > As mentioned in a private mail to Klaus: > > I tend to think /usr(/local)/sbin and manual page section 8 would be > more appropriate for vdr than /usr(/local)/bin and section 1. > > So, what do people think, would something like the attached patch be a > good idea? It might break some setups, so it clearly needs to be done > during a development cycle if ever. While sort of cosmetic, I think > this would be a good thing, and in the series of making vdr feel "more > mature" like someone mentioned in a recent "don't run as root" thread. > I support Udo's opinion too. We have a vdr running at work. It starts up as a daemon on boot. So this would match your argumentation. But we found out, that for cutting, it is easier to login to the vdr server and start a special vdr with softdevice(xv) output and (optional) streamdev-client input. The output is forwarded sufficiently fast via ssh-XForwarding in a Gigabit network. With this application in mind, I vote for not moving vdr to /usr/sbin. Anyway, I also have my own installation method, and can handle the move on my side, too. So long, Patrick Cernko -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 256 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/vdr/attachments/20060120/f0ba26ba/signature.pgp
