CopyPoint schrieb: > >> There are still 3 warnings, nothing to care to much about > > Yes, and so i did. Applied it yesterday eavening to 007. > I just wanna know why my gcc 3.3 eats this, while 2.95 and 4.0 are > complaining about? I really don't know...and for me the parentheses seem to be unnessasary...but at least the compiler shuts up. > Some quests for your freq-filter: > Is one value enough or do you need a list? > Is Polarization also needed? > Is there a more human-readable way than 'HasFreq=123456'? > Anything else i should think about? Sorry, I only wanted sorting by freq. I don't need/want a HasFreq to filter by. I think that was my fault, as I wrote I want to filter for freq. :( Just a simple sorting by freq would by fine. There are usually never 2 transponder with the same freq and diffrent polarisations on the same satelitite... I really would like this feature, but as I found a patch that allows sorting by freq in the channels-view, I could live without this feature, too. Just give this feature a low priority... The new autosort is really great. I love the TEST-NEW-CONFIG - Button! :) Frank
