Udo Richter wrote: > Markus Hahn wrote: > >>Hi there, >>now I sorted the languages as mentioned >>in the last i18n thread. >>It looks realy tidy now. > > > Hmmm. Imho the order of the languages is the same for VDR's i18n.c and > for all the plugins, so shouldn't this break the i18n's of *all* > plugins? Or do I miss something? You're of course absolutely right here. I should have thought of this, too. > On long term, its probably best to move i18n out of the c source and > into editable language definition files that can be loaded on runtime. > (I think thats what Klaus meant with 'language files'.) Yes, that's what I meant. But let's do this in version 1.5.x. Klaus
