Markus Hahn wrote: > Hi there, > now I sorted the languages as mentioned > in the last i18n thread. > It looks realy tidy now. Hmmm. Imho the order of the languages is the same for VDR's i18n.c and for all the plugins, so shouldn't this break the i18n's of *all* plugins? Or do I miss something? On long term, its probably best to move i18n out of the c source and into editable language definition files that can be loaded on runtime. (I think thats what Klaus meant with 'language files'.) Cheers, Udo
