Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > Ludwig Nussel wrote: > >Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > > > >>[...] > >>Well, I don't have a good feeling simply throwing out the > >>locks here just because NPTL can't handle them. > > > > > >NPTL is fine. The way vdr used and maybe still uses locks at some > >places was/is wrong (stuff like sleeping while locked). LinuxThreads > >support has been removed from glibc btw. LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=... will > >no longer work as workaround in the future. > > Well, can you point out exactly what VDR does wrong in rcu.c? > I don't think it is sleeping while locked... I didn't look at that specific code. cu Ludwig -- (o_ Ludwig.Nussel@xxxxxx //\ V_/_ PGP Key ID: FF8135CE
