Ludwig Nussel wrote: > Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > >>[...] >>Well, I don't have a good feeling simply throwing out the >>locks here just because NPTL can't handle them. > > > NPTL is fine. The way vdr used and maybe still uses locks at some > places was/is wrong (stuff like sleeping while locked). LinuxThreads > support has been removed from glibc btw. LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=... will > no longer work as workaround in the future. Well, can you point out exactly what VDR does wrong in rcu.c? I don't think it is sleeping while locked... Klaus
