On Montag 22 August 2005 20:43, Clemens Kirchgatterer wrote: > Ralf M?ller <rmvdr@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > For sure the whole thing only makes sense when all programs dealing > > with video streams on a vdr do the same. So I did some first steps > > patching noad. > > very interesting. i would suggest, that vdr should wrap all relevant > calls into its own APIs and make it public to plugins. Yes - it would be interesting to have that functionality in core vdr. > additionally > you could write defines for (f)open, read(), write(), ... and > redirect them to your replacements, so at least plugins that deal > with reading from harddisk by themselfs, would benefit instantly.
