Stefan Huelswitt wrote: > On 13 Aug 2005 Klaus Schmidinger <Klaus.Schmidinger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>Stefan Huelswitt wrote: >> >>>Wouldn't it be better to leave Active() untouched (instead of >>>renaming to Running()) and create a new (differently named) >>>function for the active var replacement? (e.g. Continue(), which >>>would give good readability with while(Continue())) >> >>Well, Active() reflects the internal 'active' variable, so >>Continue() would have to correspond to 'continue', which is >>a reserved keyword... > > > This is after your change, but before Active() didn't reflected > any internal variable. I don't know if one must build such a > strict rule ... Of course you don't have to, but it's nice ;-) Klaus
