On 13 Aug 2005 Klaus Schmidinger <Klaus.Schmidinger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Stefan Huelswitt wrote: >> >> Wouldn't it be better to leave Active() untouched (instead of >> renaming to Running()) and create a new (differently named) >> function for the active var replacement? (e.g. Continue(), which >> would give good readability with while(Continue())) > > Well, Active() reflects the internal 'active' variable, so > Continue() would have to correspond to 'continue', which is > a reserved keyword... This is after your change, but before Active() didn't reflected any internal variable. I don't know if one must build such a strict rule ... Just my two cents. Regards. -- Stefan Huelswitt s.huelswitt@xxxxxx | http://www.muempf.de/
