Bug/patch in transfer.c, 1.3.25

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 08:55:21AM -0700, C.Y.M wrote:
> 
> >>
> >>OK, just as long as you updated the firmware from within a few weeks ago then
> >>you should have the new one.  The version inside the "new" firmware did not
> >>change from 26d (so it may be a little confusing from just looking at it).
> > 
> 
> Sorry, when I said "26d", I meant "261d". :) But I did not notice a change in
> the version string with the latest public test.
> 
> > 
> > Hmmm ... there _are_ changes between 0x261d and
> > http://www.suse.de/~werner/test_av.tar.bz2 which is a first
> > public test for a 0x261e ;)
> > 
> > AV Synchronization should go much faster even within transfer mode.
> > 
> 
> Yes, it seems to work great. :) I guess this new version of the firmware uses a
> different method for A/V sync.  It uses the same technology as the PCM sync now?

Yes and no.  Depends on the situation, e.g. sources with low
rates (e.g. transfer mode) is handled different as sources with
high rates (e.g. from HD with UDAM enabled).

         Werner

-- 
AC3 loop through sound card http://bitstreamout.sourceforge.net/
Howto http://www.vdr-portal.de/board/thread.php?threadid=1958
------------------------------------------------------------------
 "Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having
         a  peeing section in a swimming pool." -- Edward Burr


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux