Re: fstab format, 4th field mandatory and the "sw" value

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: fstab format, 4th field mandatory and the "sw" value
From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2023 01:01:14 +0200
Cc: util-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20230404101311.3avcw3oldefbdzs6@ws.net.home>
References: <45fc7a385b006d734011a11487fbfdda4333644e.camel@christoph.anton.mitterer.name> <20230404101311.3avcw3oldefbdzs6@ws.net.home>
User-agent: Evolution 3.46.4-1

Hey Karel.


On Tue, 2023-04-04 at 12:13 +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
> I have committed:
> https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/commit/43a6b183d8945cc91307f21adc8070254eb925b5

I think it's fine.

Thanks for the clarifications.


Cheers,
Chris

References:
- fstab format, 4th field mandatory and the "sw" value
  - From: Christoph Anton Mitterer
- Re: fstab format, 4th field mandatory and the "sw" value
  - From: Karel Zak

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] lscpu: Decouple cputype and topology
Next by Date: [PATCH] Fix mmap/ioctl(3p) references in manual
Previous by thread: Re: fstab format, 4th field mandatory and the "sw" value
Next by thread: [ANNOUNCE] util-linux v2.39-rc2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Netdev] [Ethernet Bridging] [Linux Wireless] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Linux for Hams] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux Admin] [Samba]

Powered by Linux