Hey. The following is in principle just cosmetic. I recently wondered[0] what fstab entries for swap areas should look like. Some resources recommend e.g.: <swap-device/file> none swap sw 0 0 others somehting like: <swap-device/file> swap swap defaults 0 0 fstab(5) describes the appropriate values for swap for fields 1 to 3 (inclusive). But it gives nothing about the 4th. Neither do e.g. the manpages mount(8) or swapon(8). Especially there seems to be no longer any mention of "sw" getfsent(3) still contains a reference to "sw",... seems it comes originally from BSD. "default", which is documented as: > use default options: rw, suid, dev, exec, auto, nouser, and async. doesn't seem to be the best choice either. Personally I'd have said that - from the documented values alone - "auto,nouser" perhaps in addition with "rw" might the most fitting choice. fstab(5) even seems to make either "rw" or "ro" mandatory, by saying: > It contains at least the type of mount (ro or rw) which I don't thin is however really enforced (neither would it mention any such thing for auto vs. noauto). In the thread at [0], a participant suggested that the most appropriate entry would be simply: <swap-device/file> none swap i.e. omitting the 4-6th fields. However, at least by fstab(5), the 4th field (unlike #5 and #6) does seem to be required. *If* fstab(5) is considered to be like a formal description of the fstab format it would be nice if the following could be clarified: - Whether or not "rw" respectively "ro" are really required (or whether absence of both of them (and absence of "defaults") causes an implicit default to be used. The same for auto/noauto. - Whether he 4th field is mandatory and if not, what that means. Is it the meaning of "defaults" or is it nothing except for the "implicit defaults" of ro/rw noauto/auto? - Whether or not the other special values from getfsent(3), i.e. "rq", "sw", "xx" still have any meaning for linux (and if it's just that they're ignored)... and similar as it's done for fields 1-3, what should be used for swap areas. Along with that, it might perhaps make sense to replace "swap partition(s)" with "swap device(s)", as a swap device doesn't need to be a partition. Thanks, Chris. [0] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033630
