Re: unshare -m and mount propagation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 05:26:25AM +0300, Yuriy M. Kaminskiy wrote:
> I think this issue should be at least documented. And, maybe, default
> `--propagation` should be changed to `slave`.

The reason why we use 'private' is that it's the kernel default for
years and it's what has been expected by users for long time before we
introduced --propagation and any unshare(1) default.

The current --propagation default unifies things and makes unshare(1) 
portable to distributions where root fs is mounted as 'shared' (e.g. 
systemd distros) and all this in backwardly compatible way for users
who have no clue about --propagation.

So, I don't think we want to change any default to corrupt scripts where
is no explicitly specified --propagation. 

    Karel


-- 
 Karel Zak  <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
 http://karelzak.blogspot.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux