Re: tailf, really needed?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 13/03/15 14:02, Ruediger Meier wrote:
BTW I think there could be a minor improvement for coreutils tail for
the cases "file is empty" or "-n 0". Maybe we could skip opening the
file one time at the beginning. So that "tail -n0 -f logfile" would
really never access the file unless it grows.

cu,
Rudi

I suspect that might break filesystems lying about the file size, such as proc or some compressed fs. There may also be issues with some network fs.

A tail <file> with <file> of len 0, would usually be empty. However, it would be a problem not to provide an output for tail /proc/$$/status



PS: tail -f already acts a bit funny in that case, as it tails the end of the file, then thinks it has been truncated and shows it in full.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux