On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 10:52:48AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 6/6/14, 5:03 AM, Karel Zak wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 11:44:28AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote: > >> I personally have no problem to maintain information about arbitrary > >> FS in mount.8, the problem are updates. Unfortunately, kernel FS developers > >> don't care about the man page at all and it's very often not up to date. > > > > Hmm.. another possible way would be to create a script for util-linux > > that will analyze kernel Documentation/filesystems/<fsname>.txt and > > report changes that is necessary to make to mount.8. It should be > > relative simple with git. I'll try it.. > > I like that idea. Maybe <fsname.txt> will need a defined format, though, > right? Maybe asciidoc? > > I've still been meaning (in theory) to produce a mount manpage just for xfs. > I'm still willing to do that if the above doesn't pan out. I just need > to get to it. I'd be happy to do it for extN as well. Autogenerating man pages from an adhoc format sounds like the wrong approach. I'd much rather have proper man paged for every filesystem. With those we could also drop all that information from the kernel Documentation directory, where users won't looks for them anyway. Eric, if you take care of xfs an extN I'll get started on man pages for the various "minor" filesystems that don't really have active maintainers. Not sure if we should go for mount.<fstype>.8 man pages or just improve the <fstype>.5 pages, but I think the second one is more obvious. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
