On Thursday 08 May 2014, Sami Kerola wrote: > On 7 May 2014 21:12, Ruediger Meier <sweet_f_a@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wednesday 07 May 2014, Sami Kerola wrote: > >> [PATCH] tests: make kill to go-around when /proc is not available > > > > Do you really want to get it work when whole /proc is not available > > or just if /proc/$pid/status is still missing? > > Hi Rudi, > > Right, sloppy from my side. The title should say 'if > /proc/$pid/status is missing'. Test to check availability of /proc > should be in test/functions.sh, and where /proc is missing should > gracefully bail out before starting signal helper. If /proc/$pid is > available, but not the status file then waiting is unlikely to help, > and opportunistic sleep is most likely the best option. Have you also noticed my other comments to the test code? > I'll write new change before Sunday. thanks, Rudi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
