Re: [patches] a bunch of textual fixes, plus -V for renice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 02:35:27PM +0100, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> 
> Hello Sami,
> 
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013, at 12:25, Sami Kerola wrote:
> > +       fprintf(stderr, _("%s from %s\n"),
> > +                       program_invocation_short_name, PACKAGE_STRING);
> > 
> > should use UL version printing macro.
> > 
> > +       fprintf(stderr, UTIL_LINUX_VERSION);
> 
> Ah.  Okay.  Then it is good to leave that out for now.  I will provide a
> new patch for that later.

 I have fixed this issue.

> > In the patch 0007 the renice(1) adds -V short option along side with
> > -v to print version. IMHO if the upper case option is added the lower
> > case equivalent should be dropped.
> 
> I agree -v should be dropped for --version, but I didn't want to do that
> right away.  Maybe one or two releases down the line?

 Well, we have to care about backward compatibility. It seems better
 to support (now undocumented) -v as well as new and documented -V.

    Karel

-- 
 Karel Zak  <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
 http://karelzak.blogspot.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux