On Tuesday 07 August 2012 01:05 PM, Heiko Carstens wrote:
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 11:00:32AM +0530, faizan husain wrote:
On Monday 06 August 2012 05:20 PM, Heiko Carstens wrote:
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 10:10:52PM -0700, Faizan husain wrote:
From: faizan husain <faizanh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Options for lscpu command are giving incorrect output.
As per the man page or help, '-b' option should limit the output to online CPUs
and '-c' option should limit the output to offline CPUs.
But we could see the output is same for '-a','-b' and '-c' options.
Signed-off-by: faizan husain <faizanh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The -a, -b and -c options were meant to influence the output for the
extended (-e) and parsable (-p) output options.
I'm not sure it makes sense to change the default output with these
options. I'd prefer an update of the man page.
Hm?
This fix is not going to influence the default output with these
options (-e and -p),
Yes, I'm aware of that.
and it does not make any sense if -a, -b and -c option print same output.
Just to make sure we talk about the same things:
extended output: -e option
parsable output: -p option
default output : no -e or -p option specified
What I tried to say above was that the -a, -b and -c modifiers were
only added to influence the output for the extended and parsable
options.
If you have a system with a lot of cpus the output can be significantly
different for the extended and parsable options if you specify any of the
modifiers.
yes it does ...
[root@mx3650m2 ~]# lscpu -a
[...]
CPU(s): 16
On-line CPU(s) list: 0-2,4,6-8,10-15
Off-line CPU(s) list: 3,5,9
[...]
[root@mx3650m2 ~]# lscpu -e
CPU NODE SOCKET CORE L1d:L1i:L2:L3 ONLINE
0 0 0 0 0:0:0:0 yes
1 0 0 1 1:1:1:0 yes
2 0 0 2 2:2:2:0 yes
3 - - - ::: no
4 1 1 3 3:3:3:1 yes
5 - - - ::: no
6 1 1 4 4:4:4:1 yes
7 1 1 5 5:5:5:1 yes
8 0 0 0 0:0:0:0 yes
9 - - - ::: no
10 0 0 2 2:2:2:0 yes
11 0 0 6 6:6:6:0 yes
12 1 1 3 3:3:3:1 yes
13 1 1 7 7:7:7:1 yes
14 1 1 4 4:4:4:1 yes
15 1 1 5 5:5:5:1 yes
[root@mx3650m2 ~]# lscpu -p
# The following is the parsable format, which can be fed to other
# programs. Each different item in every column has an unique ID
# starting from zero.
# CPU,Core,Socket,Node,,L1d,L1i,L2,L3
0,0,0,0,,0,0,0,0
1,1,0,0,,1,1,1,0
2,2,0,0,,2,2,2,0
4,3,1,1,,3,3,3,1
6,4,1,1,,4,4,4,1
7,5,1,1,,5,5,5,1
8,0,0,0,,0,0,0,0
10,2,0,0,,2,2,2,0
11,6,0,0,,6,6,6,0
12,3,1,1,,3,3,3,1
13,7,1,1,,7,7,7,1
14,4,1,1,,4,4,4,1
15,5,1,1,,5,5,5,1
[root@mx3650m2 ~]#
The default output (no -e or -p) however is intended to give an overview
of the complete system.
So from a usability point of view: why would a user want to exclude the
line which contains the online list of cpus for the default output?
default output has no problem here,it will contain both online and offline cpus
as mentioned in the man page.
-a, --all
Include online and offline CPUs in the output (default for -e).
and if user wants to limit the output to only online/offline cpus then he can use -b / -c modifier
-b, --online
Limit the output to online CPUs (default for -p).
-c, --offline
Limit the output to offline CPUs.
From my point of view the correct "fix" would be to change the lscpu man
page in order to document that the -a, -b and -c modifiers only influence
the output for the extended and parsable options.
Thanks
Faizan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
