On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:51:30AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 10:46 +0200, Petr Uzel wrote:
> > > Wouldn't be better to always call /sbin/umount.fuse for non-roots (except
> > > umount -i)?
> >
> > Yes, that's what I meant by umount helpers. The problem is that AFAICS
> > fuse does not provide this helper.
> >
> > @Miklos: what do you think? Would it make sense to have umount.fuse
> > (most likely as symlink to /sbin/mount.fuse)? I could look into it.
>
> Could umount.fuse allow umount of fuse filesystem even if not in fstab?
Yes, as far as I understand.
> If so, then I don't see any problem with providing /sbin/umount.fuse.
OK, I'll try to look into it.
>
> Thanks,
> Miklos
Thanks,
Petr
--
Petr Uzel
IRC: ptr_uzl @ freenode
Attachment:
pgpTrGY1AH8ps.pgp
Description: PGP signature
