Re: blkid: Bug in LUKS detection?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 09:53:10AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> We can not afford to return anything we are not sure about. It may
> result in serious data corruption and data loss to return the wrong
> type of filesystem. Therefore we don't return anything if we find
> conflicting signatures, and require the user to fix the metadada and
> remove invalid conflicting signatures from the device to make the
> auto-detection working. Or not to rely on auto-probing and use the
> specified values from fstab.

That's a reasonable attitude to take; it relies on mkfs/mkswap/LUKS
setup programs to be sane, which ten years ago was certainly not the
case.  Of course some of them (i.e. Microsoft Window's format.exe)
aren't under our control, but it's rare that a user will install Linux
first, and then install Windows afterwards.

							- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux-ng" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux