Re: [PATCH] rtcwake: support not suspending

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jan 26, Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> i was pointing out your statement that rtcwake is currently not useful is 
> clearly false.  power management can be done just fine without requiring 
> extraneous packages such as pm-utils and all the fun HAL stuff.
Yes. Now that we are done nitpicking, can we discuss about how to fix
rtcwake to work on normal systems where pm-utils is being used?

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux