On Sunday 25 January 2009 20:04:25 Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Jan 26, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > rtcwake seems to work just fine to suspend a system w/out using pm-utils > > Good for you, but the existence and wide deployment of pm-utils should > make clear that in many situations a more complex infrastructure is > needed. i was pointing out your statement that rtcwake is currently not useful is clearly false. power management can be done just fine without requiring extraneous packages such as pm-utils and all the fun HAL stuff. -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
