Hi, From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [RESEND][RFC] lscpu - CPU architecture information helper Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:24:38 +0100 > Cai Qian, le Thu 10 Jul 2008 11:14:55 +0800, a écrit : > > From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: Re: [RESEND][RFC] lscpu - CPU architecture information helper > > Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 11:46:32 +0100 > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > Cai Qian, le Wed 09 Jul 2008 11:50:51 +0800, a écrit : > > > > #CPU,Core,Socket,Node,L1d,L1i,L2,L3 > > > > 0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0 > > > > 1,1,1,0,1,1,1,1 > > > > 2,2,2,1,2,2,2,2 > > > > 3,3,3,1,3,3,3,3 > > > > > > I'm wondering whether it may be a bit hard to grasp the switch from Node > > > to L1d, maybe we should add a separator there? > > > > > > > Although it maybe a little bit diffcult to match, the advantage is to > > use CSV format and be compact. Alternatively, it could be something like > > this, > > > > cpu,0,core,0,socket,0,node,0,l1d,0,l1i,0,l2,0,l3,0 > > cpu,1,core,1,socket,1,node,0,l1d,1,l1i,1,l2,1,l3,1 > > cpu,2,core,2,socket,2,node,1,l1d,2,l1i,2,l2,2,l3,2 > > cpu,3,core,3,socket,3,node,1,l1d,3,l1i,3,l2,3,l3,3 > > or > > 0,0,0,0,,0,0,0,0 > 1,1,1,0,,1,1,1,1 > 2,2,2,1,,2,2,2,2 > 3,3,3,1,,3,3,3,3 > Yes, that looks good to me. CaiQian > The empty field being a extendable way to express "between processor > topology and cache topology". > > Samuel > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux-ng" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux-ng" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
