Samuel Thibault wrote: >> _______________________________________________________________ >> | | | | | | | | | >> | cpu0 | | | | | | | | >> |______| core0 | | L1d | L1i | L2d | | | >> | | | | 16K | 16K | 256K | | | >> | cpu1 | | | | | | | | >> |______|_______| processor0 |_____|_____|______| L2i | L3 | >> | | | | | | | 1024K | 12288K | >> | cpu2 | | | | | | | | >> |______| core1 | | L1d | L1i | L2d | | | >> | | | | 16K | 16K | 256K | | | >> | cpu3 | | | | | | | | >> |______|_______|____________|_____|_____|______|_______|________| >> | | | | | | | | | >> | cpu4 | | | | | | | | >> |______| core2 | | L1d | L1i | L2d | | | >> | | | | 16K | 16K | 256K | | | >> | cpu5 | | | | | | | | >> |______|_______| processor1 |_____|_____|______| L2i | L3 | >> | | | | | | | 1024K | 12288K | >> | cpu6 | | | | | | | | >> |______| core3 | | L1d | L1i | L2d | | | >> | | | | 16K | 16K | 256K | | | >> | cpu7 | | | | | | | | >> |______|_______|____________|_____|_____|______|_______|________| > > That would be an even more readable form, and I think it wouldn't be > difficult to generate, except that you'll need to use some topology > sorting (cpu numbers are not always in local order...) That output would be great, though probably a pain in the ass to do in shell script. Pádraig. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux-ng" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
