Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > On Wed, 21 May 2008, Karel Zak wrote: > >>> Have you considered adding collectl to util-linux? If so, what was the >>> outcome? >> The util-linux is a very basic system package and I'd like to avoid >> dependences on things like Perl. > > Does collectl require Perl for building? If it has a run-time dependency > only, then it does not really differ from chkdupexe and it is up to > whoever makes a distribution to partition binary packages in a sensible > way. I notice chkdupexe is not installed with util-linux-ng as part of my fedora 8 distribution. It could easily be replaced with a shell script anyway. See the "path" case here for example: http://code.google.com/p/fslint/source/browse/trunk/fslint/findsn Pádraig. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux-ng" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
