On Wed, 21 May 2008, Karel Zak wrote: > > Have you considered adding collectl to util-linux? If so, what was the > > outcome? > > The util-linux is a very basic system package and I'd like to avoid > dependences on things like Perl. Does collectl require Perl for building? If it has a run-time dependency only, then it does not really differ from chkdupexe and it is up to whoever makes a distribution to partition binary packages in a sensible way. Maciej -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux-ng" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
