On Wednesday 07 March 2007 11:01 am, Karel Zak wrote: > On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:42:49AM -0800, David Brownell wrote: > > > There is active development, see "log" in the devel branch: > > > > > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=utils/util-linux-ng/util-linux-ng.git;a=log;h=devel > > > > Well, by active development I included "merging patches submitted" e.g. hwclock, > > Sure, but the util-linux-ng is still not in the condition when I'll > merging patches ASAP. There are tons of others and more important > patches, there wasn't any tests, there was broken build system ... > Don't forget that the code has been unmaintained for almost 2 years. I'd call some of that "catching up with the backlog", which is of course one kind of development. OK, so I'm picky; shoot me! I was pleased to see tests getting added. It's as if this were becoming a real software project ... ;) > Please, be patient at least for next 1-2 months. > > BTW, "active" also means that someone answers your mails. I hope you > see the change :-))) Yes indeedy!! > > Also see: > http://userweb.kernel.org/~kzak/util-linux-ng/ > > > I believe there is more light now :-) Yes. Worth posting a status update to LKML? - Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux-ng" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
