Re: what happend with hwclock patches?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 08:06:27PM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> See
>   http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8138

 Thanks for this link. The patch is not applied yet. Maybe I should
 release a snapshot (at least) with urgent things like hwclock or some
 mount patches.

 But I think you should ask downstream (your distribution) maitainer
 to apply these kind of patches. They have pretty stable util-linux
 packages now. I'll need few weeks to prepare useful util-linux-ng release.

 (I'm going to add the patch to Fedora tree.)

> I see there's a GIT archive but you don't seem to have merged the patch I sent
> you back in November ... and the GIT tree doesn't show any active development,
> no commits except syncing to old releases.

 Please, don't use broken gitweb at kernel.org or use it very carefully.

 There is active development, see "log" in the devel branch:

   http://git.kernel.org/?p=utils/util-linux-ng/util-linux-ng.git;a=log;h=devel

 Number of applied patches:

    $ git rev-list --pretty=oneline  devel ^master | wc -l
    52

 Number of patches in queue:

    $ ls util-* | wc -l
    49

 The good news is that I have more time and I work on that full time
 now.

        Karel

-- 
 Karel Zak  <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux-ng" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux