On 24-04-12, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > Hi, > > On 12.04.24 15:02, Michael Riesch wrote: > > Hi Marco, > > > > Thanks for your response! > > > > On 4/5/24 19:02, Marco Felsch wrote: > >> Hi Michael, > >> > >> thanks for your patches. > >> > >>> DNM: dts: arm64: rockchip: copy pf5 device tree from > >> > >> I suppose DNM means "do not merge", instead of marking it this way we > >> put the not yet upstream Linux dts files into arch as well but mark them > >> as upstream dts file, e.g.: > >> > >> - arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-innocomm-wb15-evk-upstream.dts > >> - arch/arm/dts/imx8mp-debix-model-a-upstream.dts > >> - arch/arm/dts/imx8mp-debix-som-a-bmb-08-upstream.dts > >> - arch/arm/dts/imx8mp-debix-som-a-upstream.dtsi > > I have been wondering if we should add yet another device tree > directory for kernel DTs that are not yet in the kernel, e.g. > common/boards/dts. Then we can place full DTs there, remove them > once they are in dts/ and clean up arch/$ARCH/dts/ that way. > > > OK, I'll do it that way! > > > >> Once the files are usptream we can remove them. > > > > Is this something I should keep in mind or may I expect that this > > happens automagically? > > Usually, when someone notices. Having them in a single directory > as suggested above may make it easier to sport no longer needed DTs. > > Thoughts? +1 from my side. Regards, Marco
