чт, 9 июн. 2022 г. в 10:32, Sascha Hauer <sha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 08:12:44AM +0300, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> > of_get_reset_source_priority() has no users,
> > so it can be safely removed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan <eagle.alexander923@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > common/reset_source.c | 20 +++-----------------
> > include/reset_source.h | 7 -------
> > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/common/reset_source.c b/common/reset_source.c
> > index 3554cbd0fb..dccb683231 100644
> > --- a/common/reset_source.c
> > +++ b/common/reset_source.c
> > @@ -76,7 +76,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(reset_source_set_prinst);
> >
> > void reset_source_set_device(struct device_d *dev, enum reset_src_type st)
> > {
> > - int priority = of_get_reset_source_priority(dev->device_node);
> > + unsigned int priority = RESET_SOURCE_DEFAULT_PRIORITY;
>
> You said of_get_reset_source_priority() has no users, but here you are
> removing one.
Hello.
Here I meant users outside of the unit :)
Should I create v2?
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
