On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 12:19:32PM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> state_by_name itself can't be made deep probe aware as it doesn't have
> enough information on what to probe. Board code calling it must instead
> itself ensure that the state has been proved (either via initcall
> ordering or by calling e.g. of_ensure_probed_by_alias). For
> state_by_node we can do it better: We can ensure probe of the supplied
> device node. For most purposes, users just want to probe the default
> state. This can now be done with state_by_alias("state").
>
> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> common/state/state.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
> include/state.h | 12 +++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
