On 31.05.21 09:40, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Hello Antony,
>
> On 31.05.21 09:38, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>> SiFive SoCs have separate I-Caches that require self-modifying code
>> like barebox' relocation and PBL extraction code to do cache
>> maintenance. Implement sync_caches_for_execution and use it where
>> appropriate.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> +void sync_caches_for_execution(void)
>> +{
>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAS_CACHE))
>> + asm volatile ("fence.i" ::: "memory");
>
> If Erizo on FPGA chokes on this, we can have it pass
> along a feature flag from PBL that says it doesn't
> need cache maintenance. Please advise.
I now skip over fence.i in the exception handler, so it should be ok
to call this, even on systems that lack Zifencei ISA extension.
I'll send out a v2 soon.
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
