On 06.05.21 15:07, Marco Felsch wrote: > On 21-05-06 14:06, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On 06.05.21 13:22, Marco Felsch wrote: >>> Set the new introduced flag to be able to check if the cdev is an >>> mmc/mci device. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> drivers/mci/mci-core.c | 1 + >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/mci/mci-core.c b/drivers/mci/mci-core.c >>> index 017f25d35f..c0fbcb385f 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/mci/mci-core.c >>> +++ b/drivers/mci/mci-core.c >>> @@ -420,6 +420,7 @@ static void mci_part_add(struct mci *mci, uint64_t size, >>> part->size = size; >>> part->blk.cdev.name = name; >>> part->blk.cdev.partname = partname; >>> + part->blk.cdev.flags |= DEVFS_IS_MCI_DEV; >>> part->blk.blockbits = SECTOR_SHIFT; >>> part->blk.num_blocks = mci_calc_blk_cnt(size, part->blk.blockbits); >>> part->area_type = area_type; >> >> This is called for hardware partitions, like boot and general >> purpose partitions. >> >> For boot partitions, the later commit is wrong. I don't know what the default >> file name for mmc GPP block partitions is, Jürgen? > > Arg right, the boot partition name scheme differs. For GPP there should > be seperated devices, don't know that directly. > > Should we first add the support for MMC_BLK_DATA_AREA_MAIN only? This is > the most tested path. Ack. -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox